Posted on

O’Connor, Holy Week and Walking Backwards

Today is Flannery O’Connor’s birthday. She would have been 88, and I would have taken great joy watching this iconoclast toss firecrackers into our modern sensibilities. Strange, isn’t it, to think O’Conner could have lived into the era of YouTube if lupus hadn’t cut her low at 39. O’Conner’s first claim to fame happened when she was six. A British newsreel company traveled to her family farm in Millsville, Georgia to capture young Flannery’s (she went by Mary then) feat: she taught a chicken to walk backwards. “I was just there to assist the chicken,” she said, “but it was the high point in my life. Everything since has been anticlimax.”

Hyperbole, of course, but O’Conner did, in so many ways, walk backwards into her world. She was a farm girl, spending much of her energies raising both barnyard poultry and exotic fowl (with particular interest in peacocks). She was Southern, which made her an oddity among the literary elite. She was Catholic, which made her an oddity among the Southern aristocracy. Yet she was a person of her place, a person of her people. She wrote the world in which she lived. When criticized for her stories’ dark underbelly, O’Connor was unmoved. “The stories are hard but they are hard because there is nothing harder or less sentimental than Christian realism… when I see these stories described as horror stories I am always amused because the reviewer always has hold of the wrong horror.”

The Christian way, from its very core, is to walk backwards. In yesterday’s reading from the prophet Isaiah, the image of the bloodied Messiah offering his cheeks to those who ripped his beard would not leave me. “I did not hide my face from insult and spitting,” said the suffering Savior. God never hides from insult or spitting, from the dark nightmares of our world, from the sorrowful stories we live. God does not hide from the horror. God steps into the very middle of it.

Isn’t it strange that Christian faith has so often been used as a means to deny our bleakest realities? Isn’t it strange that some of our weakest art, our most naive fiction, our blandest passions, arrive with the label ‘Christian’ plastered upon their fragile fa├žade? How can God heal what we will not acknowledge? How can Christ’s passion strike into the crucible of our lives if we do not own the fact that there is a powerful darkness, if we do not tell the truth of how we flail and rage but appear entirely helpless to enact any remedy? With our Christian edicts and our moral announcements, perhaps we’ve got hold of the wrong horror.

And how can the beauty we offer possibly embody our full glory and splendor if we believe our gritty, emblazoned humanness unworthy of our keen attention and our unvarnished description?

We need art that carries us into our full humanness, that won’t let us go until we do justice with the bare facts of our lives. We need stories that grapple with all of our humanness, narrating both the havoc and the luster. We need to be reminded that Easter announces our hope that ruin is not the end. There is joy. There is life. But they come through, not around, the valley of the shadow of death. And this traverse will surely seem like walking backwards.

 

 

15 thoughts on “O’Connor, Holy Week and Walking Backwards

  1. best. post. eva.
    loved every word. thank you.

    1. you’re welcome, Kelli.

  2. ‘hold of the wrong horror’…damn.

    1. that’s line snagged me.

      To get more of her bite, just before this, she also said, “anything that comes out of the South is going to be called grotesque by the northern reader, unless it is grotesque, in which case it is going to be called realistic.” I think there are more parallels that could be drawn here…

  3. This chicken is grateful for the assistance.

    1. you do cluck nicely, I’ve noticed.

  4. Narrating both the havoc and the luster…poetic truth. I want to soak in this today so as not to miss a droplet of its goodness. LOVE IT. Sharing it now on the wings of twitter.

    1. thanks for reading – and sharing.

  5. loved this – have read a few of your mighty posts via mutual friend John Blase – this one I sorely needed to hear as have been challenged lately as to why I write about my wild and messy life and why it people to see such vulnerability – your answer is best as I’ve seen “we need stories that grapple with all of our humanness, narrating both the havoc and the luster.” Thank you….

    1. Margaret, any friend of John’s is a friend of mine. You have a beautiful writing site. I’m betting there are beautiful words there too. Nice to connect.

  6. “And how can the beauty we offer possibly embody our full glory and splendor if we believe our gritty, emblazoned humanness unworthy of our keen attention and our unvarnished description?” Unvarnished beauty – yes – thank you.

  7. Excellent! Bravo! Yes! Here’s to walking backwards and writing both the havoc and the luster. Amen!

  8. Grateful for your toughmindedness, and eloquence, out in the blogosphere, Winn. Your writing would charm Flannery, I think. (If she ever allowed herself to be charmed by anything human…) Like the other commenters, I love her walking backwards image, her describing having hold of the wrong horror, and your ‘narrating both the havoc and the luster.’ Seems like you’re practicin what you’re preachin…

    1. I hope I am, most of the time at least.

  9. […] we are to walk backwards in our world and if we are to reckon with the true horrors, then we need broken music. We […]

words have a way of making friends. drop a few here.